Licensee/Licensor/Retailer Red FlagsJune 21, 2011 at 7:09 pm by Ted MininniLicensed products always get into trouble if they’re not performing up to snuff. Even more so now, as retailers push more deeply into their assortments and commit to increasing their private label presence, and more products are on the firing line than just a few SKUs among national brands. This got me thinking about more than design development for licensing programs – one of our areas of focus here at Design Force – because this is such an important issue. In our work with licensors, we implicitly understand that the licensed property is only as strong in the marketplace as its weakest licensee. If an agreement is made between a licensor and a licensee whose products don’t really live up to their end of the bargain or extend the property value, or if they just aren’t a good fit for that property, it can signal a real problem on many levels. It reflects badly on the property, the licensor and their choice of licensees. And it makes retailers seek justification for keeping that licensed product on the shelf. Even worse: it makes them focus on the property itself and every licensed product that represents it for possible elimination. So, here’s a troubleshooting list for licensed property owners (so it doesn’t ever get to that point).
As ever more licensed properties come to market, and retailers focus on their own needs, it’s important to make sure licensor-licensee-retailer relationships are strong, vibrant and collaborative. It’s also crucial that the license is extended on the right merchandise from the right licensees to maximize the property’s strength at retail.
I’d love to get feedback from you on this issue. Categories:Licensing, Consumer Products |