Why Most Package Design Refreshes FlopJuly 27, 2011 at 5:20 pm by Ted MininniContemporizing packaging is routinely executed by consumer product companies, but the end result is not always good. According to research conducted by Perception Research Services, “10% of package redesigns spike sales and 20% spur declines”. This clearly points to a problem with the way packaging is being revitalized. Even major brands have been guilty of improper package refreshes, resulting in considerable consumer pushback in highly competitive product categories. How could any of us forget the Tropicana debacle of a couple of years ago? So before beginning a package refresh, let’s ask the following questions:
Visual brand assets must be guarded zealously – especially if they own considerable equity. Package design changes that play up key visual assets will win at retail. Likewise, simplifying to better segment and clarify varieties is generally well-received by busy consumers. On the flip side, diminishing or downplaying key assets or making it harder to discern varieties will lead to confusion or outright repudiation by consumers. After assessing what really needs to be done, we can proceed with the knowledge that the package refresh is much more likely to succeed at retail. More sales, better turns and stronger consumer engagement must always be the end goal; otherwise, it isn’t worth executing a package revitalization. Questions:
What are your thoughts on this topic? I’d love to hear from you. Categories:Branding, Package Design, Consumer Products, Marketing Thought Leadership |